Search for: "Gregory v. U.S. Department of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
Gregory Curfman (American Medical Association), United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:43 pm
U.S. (07-1512), is one of a series of rulngs contributing to confusion over the meaning of the Clean Water Act, the Justice Department prefers to have that issue decided by the Justices in a newly filed government appeal — U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:28 pm
” Gregory v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 8:30 am
Solicitor General Gregory G. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 1:04 am
Moving to speed up action in the Supreme Court on the President’s power to order the military detention of an individual suspected of terrorism and captured inside the U.S., the Justice Department on Friday asked the Court to deny review of the case of Al-Marri v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
For example, as then-Justice Rehnquist wrote in Griffin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
Department of Justice, the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm
The article states that, since 1997, federal courts have determined that Department of Justice attorneys violated laws or ethical rules in some 201 cases, including the duty expressed by Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland over 70 years ago in Berger v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:32 pm
Supreme Court will address in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 11:25 am
Gregory T. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:39 pm
Jefferson, Louisiana Democrat, the Justice Department filed an appeal on Wednesday (U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
Gregory Sisk previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
“ Lozano v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:22 am
An interesting Tenth Circuit decision yesterday in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Department of Justice doubled down. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:40 am
In July, U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 10:41 am
Last week, EFF urged the full U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
Department of Justice, the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
That is the central question that justices of the Supreme Court considered during oral argument Dec. 7, 2020, in the case of Hungary v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:32 am
” Snyder specified that the State Department was uncertain about a particular fact — how this case would proceed in Hungary were U.S. courts to abstain. [read post]
